Post by recondite on Nov 1, 2013 12:24:25 GMT -5
*Steps up on soapbox and tests microphone*
I feel that a lot of the issues I read about on here lack one MAJOR thing, which is communication between the DH/BF and SM/GF.
A lot of situations can be tamed by addressing your concerns with DH/BF. In my case DH has custody of my SD and I am the primary caregiver. While it is not always possible to avoid dealing with BM I can, and do, keep interaction to a minimum.
If a situation does present itself DH and I always discuss the problem with one another before anything else. This is something that I don't see too often on posts from SM/GF. More often than not it seems that you are trying to handle the situation on your own. In my opinion, that is something that should not be. As SM/GFs we can lessen the blow by allowing DH/BF to deal with the drama unless it directly effects you and your household. Even then the conversation requires DH and yourself to figure out what needs to be done to rectify the situation.
If I am having a problem with the way things are being handled I let DH know. It is his responsibility to make sure that I am comfortable and at ease. If the situation requires an adjustment DH and I decide what works best for our household and he will then relay the information to BM. There is no discussion to be had once we have decided what works for our household. As long as the decision does not require BM to alter her schedule or visitation in any way there should be no problem, even though there is always a problem.
It seems to me that a lot of the DH/BF in these cases are at the mercy of BM and it becomes very frustrating for the SM/GF to watch another woman attempt to control DH/BF by using their child(ren) as a pawn. While I have experienced this and completely agree that it is annoying it is a decision that DH/BF must make to take back control of the situation and put a stop to BMs shenanigans. If court is required, which was in our case, then so be it. There are many ways to have a court order put into place without retaining a lawyer, although ill-advised if you cannot find your way around court documents and hate reading for days on end. Here is a site that helped us a lot:
www.lawhelpinteractive.org
If DH/BF is fully committed to being an active participant in their child(ren)s life then putting it in writing, along with CS, should not be a problem. From that point ANY deviation to the agreement should be notated and, if necessary, alert the court and proper authorities.
What I see happening is that there are a lot of men who are NOT fulfilling their obligations as parents, but get upset when they are denied access and certain rights to their child(ren). If this refers to your DH/BF then the problem does not lie with the BM, but the mate you have chosen. When DH and I were dating if I did not see how committed he was to my SD we would have never been married. This was/is an indication of how DH will behave if our relationship should end and children are involved.
In closing, as SM/GFs most of the drama coming our way can be cut off at the head by minimizing, and eliminating when possible, communication with BM and increasing the communication with DH/BF regarding our concerns. If DH/BF does not care to listen or dismisses your concerns then it is up to you to decide if he is the person you want to spend your time/life with.
Note that I am speaking of mentally stable SM/GFs. NOT those who LIVE for the drama and are more than happy to be active originators and participants in such behavior.
Also, depending on the BM, this does not mean that attempts will not continue to try and upset the balance in your life. We still have BMD, but we refuse to allow her to drag us into her chaotic life. The old adage says "Misery loves company". Make a choice not to entertain misery.
*Steps down*
I feel that a lot of the issues I read about on here lack one MAJOR thing, which is communication between the DH/BF and SM/GF.
A lot of situations can be tamed by addressing your concerns with DH/BF. In my case DH has custody of my SD and I am the primary caregiver. While it is not always possible to avoid dealing with BM I can, and do, keep interaction to a minimum.
If a situation does present itself DH and I always discuss the problem with one another before anything else. This is something that I don't see too often on posts from SM/GF. More often than not it seems that you are trying to handle the situation on your own. In my opinion, that is something that should not be. As SM/GFs we can lessen the blow by allowing DH/BF to deal with the drama unless it directly effects you and your household. Even then the conversation requires DH and yourself to figure out what needs to be done to rectify the situation.
If I am having a problem with the way things are being handled I let DH know. It is his responsibility to make sure that I am comfortable and at ease. If the situation requires an adjustment DH and I decide what works best for our household and he will then relay the information to BM. There is no discussion to be had once we have decided what works for our household. As long as the decision does not require BM to alter her schedule or visitation in any way there should be no problem, even though there is always a problem.
It seems to me that a lot of the DH/BF in these cases are at the mercy of BM and it becomes very frustrating for the SM/GF to watch another woman attempt to control DH/BF by using their child(ren) as a pawn. While I have experienced this and completely agree that it is annoying it is a decision that DH/BF must make to take back control of the situation and put a stop to BMs shenanigans. If court is required, which was in our case, then so be it. There are many ways to have a court order put into place without retaining a lawyer, although ill-advised if you cannot find your way around court documents and hate reading for days on end. Here is a site that helped us a lot:
www.lawhelpinteractive.org
If DH/BF is fully committed to being an active participant in their child(ren)s life then putting it in writing, along with CS, should not be a problem. From that point ANY deviation to the agreement should be notated and, if necessary, alert the court and proper authorities.
What I see happening is that there are a lot of men who are NOT fulfilling their obligations as parents, but get upset when they are denied access and certain rights to their child(ren). If this refers to your DH/BF then the problem does not lie with the BM, but the mate you have chosen. When DH and I were dating if I did not see how committed he was to my SD we would have never been married. This was/is an indication of how DH will behave if our relationship should end and children are involved.
In closing, as SM/GFs most of the drama coming our way can be cut off at the head by minimizing, and eliminating when possible, communication with BM and increasing the communication with DH/BF regarding our concerns. If DH/BF does not care to listen or dismisses your concerns then it is up to you to decide if he is the person you want to spend your time/life with.
Note that I am speaking of mentally stable SM/GFs. NOT those who LIVE for the drama and are more than happy to be active originators and participants in such behavior.
Also, depending on the BM, this does not mean that attempts will not continue to try and upset the balance in your life. We still have BMD, but we refuse to allow her to drag us into her chaotic life. The old adage says "Misery loves company". Make a choice not to entertain misery.
*Steps down*